Third Time Lucky – Perhaps?

Posted on 18 March 2019 by John Curtice

In a variation of the now regular ritual in MPs’ consideration of Brexit, this week we face the prospect that perhaps there will be another votebut perhaps not. It seems the government has decided that there is little point in holding another vote on Mrs May’s deal this week unless it is clear that this time MPs would vote in favour. But if the government does not hold a vote, the Prime Minister will find herself at the European Council later this week seeking an extension to the Article 50 process of uncertain length and purpose.

So, with the possibility at least of another ‘meaningful’ vote this week – or maybe next (?) – has the deal become more popular among voters?  Or are there signs that some Leave voters at least have come around to the view that MPs should back the deal because that might be the only way of ensuring that Brexit happens? Meanwhile, if there is another vote it is possible that the proposal from two Labour MPs that Mrs May’s deal should be passed but then subjected to a referendum will finally be put forward as an amendment. However, is there any evidence that the public are warming more strongly to the prospect of another vote?

Finally, amidst the uncertainty one thing does seem to be clear – some kind of decision will have to be made about the extension of the Article 50 process this week. But how do voters view that prospect?

We consider what light the polls that have been released in the last week or so can cast on the answer to these three questions.

Attitudes to the Deal

There is little sign that the deal has become more popular.  In two polls it conducted last week, YouGov found both times that just 13% think the deal would represent a good outcome, while 40% feel its passage would be a bad outcome.  Both figures are very similar to what they had been on four previous occasions. Equally, when Opinium asked voters whether they preferred Mrs May’s deal or remaining in the EU, 36% said they preferred the deal and 46% remaining in the EU – exactly the same figures as a fortnight ago.

However, there are signs that some Leave voters are now inclined to feel, however reluctantly, that the deal should now be accepted. Although still only around 15% of Leave supporters think that the deal is a good outcome, according to YouGov a third now say that it would be an acceptable compromise, whereas hitherto only around a quarter or so had expressed that view.

At the same time, Leave voters have become more inclined to the view that MPs should vote for the deal anyway. In two polls last week, YouGov found that around a third of all voters now say that MPs should vote for the deal, whereas previously only just over a quarter had expressed that view. The increase in the proportion who say that MPs should vote for the deal has occurred almost entirely among those who voted Leave, 45% of whom now say that MPs should accept the deal. Hitherto only around one in three were of that view. Indeed, Leave voters are now more inclined to say that the deal should be accepted than they are to feel it should be rejected, a finding that was replicated by Survation in a poll for the Daily Mail.

Holding Another Referendum

This continues to be an issue where the balance of opinion depends on how the question is asked.  Polls that refer to a public vote and which do not specify that Remain would be an option on the ballot paper secure more support for the idea than those which refer to another referendum and make it clear that remaining in the EU would be an option.

This was illustrated perfectly by YouGov over the weekend, when the results of two polls that it conducted at exactly the same time were released. The first was conducted by YouGov for The People’s Vote campaign. It referred to a public vote and did not state that remain would be an option. Nearly half (48%) said they were in favour while just 36% indicated that they were opposed. The second was conducted by the company for The Times. The question asked whether there should be a referendum on remaining or leaving. While 38% said that there should be such a referendum, 52% stated that there should not.

The one feature that these polls had in common was that the figures were very similar to what they had been in January, suggesting that the Brexit impasse has so far at least not served to persuade voters that holding another ballot is the only way of resolving the issue. True, the People’s Vote campaign itself suggested their poll indicated that there had been a ‘surge’ in support for another referendum. This was based on a comparison with a poll conducted by YouGov on 31 January to 1 February (that was seemingly unreported at the time) that had found only 42% in favour and 41% against. In truth, the latest finding simply appears to represent a return to the status quo ante after having dipped to an unusually low level.

That said, one other poll at the weekend did suggest there had been an increase in support for holding a second ballot. Undertaken by Opinium, it reported that as many as 50% now feel that ‘there should be some form of public vote’ given that parliament had voted down Mrs May’s deal, while only 39% disagreed. This represented a much larger lead in favour than had hitherto been in evidence in the responses to this question. Perhaps the wording of the question captured some of the exasperation that voters feel about MPs’ apparent failure to make a decision. We should, of course, note that this is another question of the ‘public vote’, remain not specified, variety.

Delaying Brexit

Perhaps, unsurprisingly, this is a subject on which Remain voters and Leave supporters disagree, leaving voters as a whole relatively evenly divided about the merits of extending the Article 50 process.

Immediately before the parliamentary vote on the subject on Thursday, YouGov found that among voters as a whole, slightly more (43%) were against than in favour (38%). But the more important finding was that while 65% of Remain voters were in favour, 75% of Leave supporters were opposed. Conversely, Hanbury Research reported that among voters as a whole, 44% believed that MPs should vote for an extension, while 40% felt they should not. Again, however, Remain voters (67% were in favour) and leave supporters (60% opposed) were of a very different view.

This picture has been replicated in polls taken since the parliamentary vote that have asked voters whether they would prefer a delay to Brexit to either leaving with or without a deal. For example, YouGov found that 45% of all voters would prefer delay (and as many as 76% of Remain voters), while 41% opted for leaving without a deal (an outcome backed by 73% of Leave voters). Meanwhile, Survation reported that 41% of all voters (and 63% of Remain supporters) thought that Article 50 should be extended, while 34% (but 51% of Leave voters) preferred to leave on the basis of the government’s deal. The opposition of Tory Brexiteer MPs to the extension of the Article 50 evidently reflects the predominant view among those who would like to leave the EU.

Remainers and Leavers also have very different views about how long an extension would be acceptable. While, according to Hanbury Research, 53% of Leave voters would find it acceptable to delay Brexit by a month, relatively few are willing to accept anything much longer. Just 37% would tolerate a three-month delay, while only 20% would consider a six-month one. In contrast, as many as 52% of Remain supporters would accept a six-month delay, while slightly more regard as much as a two-year delay as acceptable (48%) than as unacceptable (44%). Once again it seems that a debate about process is, for many voters, a surrogate for the argument about the merits of Brexit in the first place.

John Curtice

By John Curtice

John Curtice is Senior Research Fellow at NatCen and at 'UK in a Changing Europe', Professor of Politics at Strathclyde University, and Chief Commentator on the What UK Thinks: EU website.

9 thoughts on “Third Time Lucky – Perhaps?

  1. we should leave without a deal,,,,,,,,,,, anything is better than us bowing to both French and germans who if the truth was known have a population greater than our own who want to leave also but have not had the opportunity to have their voice heard by their own governments
    this embarrassment we have at the moment with our own government is just what the governments of both germany and france together with the government of GB want to hang on at all costs to the EU DREAM UNTIL THE LISBON TREATY KICKS IN and our fate is sealed for ever!!!!!!Report

  2. When asked whether there should be a referendum on remaining or leaving,38% said yes, 52% no. I don’t think that it is a correct interpretation to say that this is because the public don’t want Remain on the ballot. Despite wanting Article 50 revoked, I and I expect many others in my position would also say no to that question, but my objection is to Brexit as a general concept being put on the ballot as an alternative to Remain, rather than a specific form of Brexit.

    Brexit means many things to many people, from the hardest of Hard Brexit to Norway++, however implausible each person’s view of what is achievable might be. To aggregate votes for all of those options and set them against a single concept such as Remain is a flawed process. Any second referendum should be on a specific version of Brexit, such as May’s deal, with the alternative of Remain. Report

  3. We need to think carefully about what is meant by ‘delay’. The danger is that people will lose sight of the fact that 21 months (at least) of delay is built into what May negotiated.Report

  4. I am European and would prefer the U.K. to stay but, even I am starting to think that leaving under any sort of circumstance is better than this mess.
    No one will die and cooperation with Europe will surely continue. Just leave, with or withou a deal, and get on with your lives! I don’t understand why there hasn’t been more planning for a no-deal Brexit. Come on Britain! Where’s your pragmatism?Report

  5. Do these people who want another vote have nothing else better to do with there lives than to go and vote again these mps are paid to get it sorted out the only reason they do not want a no deal is because they will lose there redundancy money from the EU most of them are not thinking about the country but how much money they will loseReport

  6. A general election does not really solve anything as in the first past the post system a party with 40+% of the vote can have a whopping majority. The only logical way round this has to be a referendum again in the hope of getting a more conclusive result. And before anyone starts 51.9% is not exactly conclusive – over time this will change and indeed it could go up or down. That’s why generally referendums in other countries have had a minimum % to define a win.Report

  7. From the statistics it appears that younger voters who have come of age since the 2016 referendum are overwhelmingly in favour of remaining in the EU.

    It would also be interesting to know the impact of mortality and incapacity among older voters over the same period, given their preference for Brexit in 2016.Report

  8. Many thanks for this excellent site and for all your unbiased analysis, John Curtice. It’s a beacon of clarity in a morass of fake news, lies (on both sides) and fiddled stats.Report

  9. Despite the FTPA Are there no figures on the popularity or otherwise of holding a General Election to secure a Parliament that better reflected the views of the public?Report

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *